messages_direct
listlengths 2
2
| messages_cot
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAl-Qaida-linked militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\n\nStatement:\nThere have been suicide bombings in Indonesia . ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAl-Qaida-linked militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\n\nStatement:\nThere have been suicide bombings in Indonesia . ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Al-Qaida-linked militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\n[Inference] This implies that there have been suicide bombings in Indonesia.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPizza Party<br>Our field trip to Pizza Hut was a lot of fun. We were allowed in the kitchen, where we were shown how to make pizza. We each made our own pizzas to cook in the oven. Since we were little, we weren't allowed to use the ovens ourselves. We ate in the dining room before going back to school.\n\nStatement:\nOnly one kid got to make a Pizza and Pizza Hut",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPizza Party<br>Our field trip to Pizza Hut was a lot of fun. We were allowed in the kitchen, where we were shown how to make pizza. We each made our own pizzas to cook in the oven. Since we were little, we weren't allowed to use the ovens ourselves. We ate in the dining room before going back to school.\n\nStatement:\nOnly one kid got to make a Pizza and Pizza Hut",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, We each made our own pizzas to cook in the oven.\n[Extraction] The document also states that the field trip was to Pizza Hut.\n[Inference] The phrase \"We each\" implies that multiple kids made their own pizzas, not just one.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn October, however, amid rising tensions between the government and opposition groups, a car bomb seriously injured an opposition politician and killed his driver, in Beirut.\n\nStatement:\nIn October, a car bomb seriously injured an opposition politician and killed his driver, in Canada .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn October, however, amid rising tensions between the government and opposition groups, a car bomb seriously injured an opposition politician and killed his driver, in Beirut.\n\nStatement:\nIn October, a car bomb seriously injured an opposition politician and killed his driver, in Canada .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, a car bomb seriously injured an opposition politician and killed his driver, in Beirut.\n[Extraction] However, the document does not state that the incident occurred in Canada.\n[Extraction] The document states that the incident occurred in Beirut, which is not in Canada.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe act provides that it is necessary to obtain the consent of the attorney general before instituting proceedings in respect of an offence when it is alleged that the injuries that caused death were sustained more than three years before death, or in cases where the accused has already been found guilty of an offence related to the death.\n\nStatement:\nif the injures happen 3 years or more then it is up to your discretion to seek the attorney general consent",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe act provides that it is necessary to obtain the consent of the attorney general before instituting proceedings in respect of an offence when it is alleged that the injuries that caused death were sustained more than three years before death, or in cases where the accused has already been found guilty of an offence related to the death.\n\nStatement:\nif the injures happen 3 years or more then it is up to your discretion to seek the attorney general consent",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, it is necessary to obtain the consent of the attorney general before instituting proceedings in respect of an offence when it is alleged that the injuries that caused death were sustained more than three years before death.\n[Inference] This implies that obtaining the attorney general's consent is mandatory, not discretionary, if the injuries happened 3 years or more before death.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHe is the professor of theater and drama at Loyola University and the director of Wilson's \"Two Trains Running,\" now onstage at Pegasus Players.\n\nStatement:\nhe teaches at a university whose name starts with the letter l.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHe is the professor of theater and drama at Loyola University and the director of Wilson's \"Two Trains Running,\" now onstage at Pegasus Players.\n\nStatement:\nhe teaches at a university whose name starts with the letter l.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, He is the professor of theater and drama at Loyola University.\n[Inference] The name \"Loyola University\" starts with the letter L.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBudapest consists of two parts, Buda and Pest, which are situated on opposite sides of the river and connected by a series of bridges.\n\nStatement:\ntourist would not know that Budapest consists of two parts",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBudapest consists of two parts, Buda and Pest, which are situated on opposite sides of the river and connected by a series of bridges.\n\nStatement:\ntourist would not know that Budapest consists of two parts",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Budapest consists of two parts, Buda and Pest.\n[Inference] The statement that a tourist would not know this information is not supported by the document, as it simply states the fact about Budapest's composition without referencing tourists' knowledge.\n[Conclusion] However, the statement is [Not Attributable] because the document does not provide information about what tourists know or do not know.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIf you have rheumatic heart disease, high blood pressure, or diabetes, or take digitalis drugs, vitamin E can be harmful.\n\nStatement:\nvitamin e can be harmfl if you have high blood pressure or diabetes",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIf you have rheumatic heart disease, high blood pressure, or diabetes, or take digitalis drugs, vitamin E can be harmful.\n\nStatement:\nvitamin e can be harmfl if you have high blood pressure or diabetes",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, If you have rheumatic heart disease, high blood pressure, or diabetes, or take digitalis drugs, vitamin E can be harmful.\n[Inference] This implies that vitamin E can indeed be harmful if you have high blood pressure or diabetes.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTree<br>There was a tree we thought was dead. We tried getting estimates but it was expensive. But a big storm then rolled through. The high winds brought down the tree. Fortunately it didn't damage anything.\n\nStatement:\nThe big strorm rolled through last week.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTree<br>There was a tree we thought was dead. We tried getting estimates but it was expensive. But a big storm then rolled through. The high winds brought down the tree. Fortunately it didn't damage anything.\n\nStatement:\nThe big strorm rolled through last week.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, a big storm rolled through, but the document does not specify when the storm occurred.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nFertin Pharma is a company that specializes in developing and producing medicated chewing gum. The company is based in Vejle, Denmark, and currently employs approximately 600 people. Fertin Pharma is wholly owned by the Bagger-Sorensen Group, who also owns the affiliated company Gumlink, formerly known as Dandy.\n\nStatement:\nFertin Pharma has no specialties",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nFertin Pharma is a company that specializes in developing and producing medicated chewing gum. The company is based in Vejle, Denmark, and currently employs approximately 600 people. Fertin Pharma is wholly owned by the Bagger-Sorensen Group, who also owns the affiliated company Gumlink, formerly known as Dandy.\n\nStatement:\nFertin Pharma has no specialties",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Fertin Pharma is a company that specializes in developing and producing medicated chewing gum.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPallipattu (Tamil:பள்ளிபட்டு) is a town in Tiruvallur district in the state of Tamil Nadu, India. It is located 113 kilometres (70 miles) from Chennai, 40 kilometres ( 25 miles) from Chittoor district , 51 kilometres (32 miles) from Tirupathi, 36 kilometres (22 miles) from Tiruttani, 50 kilometres (32 miles) from Arakkonam and border place of the state of Andhra Pradesh\n\nStatement:\npallipattu is accessible by train. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPallipattu (Tamil:பள்ளிபட்டு) is a town in Tiruvallur district in the state of Tamil Nadu, India. It is located 113 kilometres (70 miles) from Chennai, 40 kilometres ( 25 miles) from Chittoor district , 51 kilometres (32 miles) from Tirupathi, 36 kilometres (22 miles) from Tiruttani, 50 kilometres (32 miles) from Arakkonam and border place of the state of Andhra Pradesh\n\nStatement:\npallipattu is accessible by train. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, there is no information about Pallipattu being accessible by train.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nA magnifying glass (called a hand lens in laboratory contexts) is a convex lens that is used to produce a magnified image of an object. The lens is usually mounted in a frame with a handle (see image). A magnifying glass can be used to focus light, such as to concentrate the sun's radiation to create a hot spot at the focus for fire starting.\n\nStatement:\nThe convex lens of a hand lens is used to create a magnified image of something. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nA magnifying glass (called a hand lens in laboratory contexts) is a convex lens that is used to produce a magnified image of an object. The lens is usually mounted in a frame with a handle (see image). A magnifying glass can be used to focus light, such as to concentrate the sun's radiation to create a hot spot at the focus for fire starting.\n\nStatement:\nThe convex lens of a hand lens is used to create a magnified image of something. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, a magnifying glass (called a hand lens in laboratory contexts) is a convex lens that is used to produce a magnified image of an object.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nFinally, the last thing that I want to do -I'm answering soliloquy with soliloquy here. I'm not sure if this is a dialogue. Finally, I am acutely cognizant of the fact that this trial has abundant media coverage, and it is surely not my intent to force a constitutional confrontation with two reporters and to create a side show that we don't need to. That's why we're meeting in chambers.\n\nStatement:\nThe two reporters are brunettes",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nFinally, the last thing that I want to do -I'm answering soliloquy with soliloquy here. I'm not sure if this is a dialogue. Finally, I am acutely cognizant of the fact that this trial has abundant media coverage, and it is surely not my intent to force a constitutional confrontation with two reporters and to create a side show that we don't need to. That's why we're meeting in chambers.\n\nStatement:\nThe two reporters are brunettes",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, there is a mention of two reporters.\n[Extraction] However, the document does not provide any information about the physical characteristics of the reporters, including their hair color.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to avoid eviction<br>Make timely payments. The easiest way to avoid eviction is to pay your rent on time. Read your lease to see if there is any grace period (such as three or five days).\n\nStatement:\ndon't use the grace period or your landlord won't have that much respect for you",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to avoid eviction<br>Make timely payments. The easiest way to avoid eviction is to pay your rent on time. Read your lease to see if there is any grace period (such as three or five days).\n\nStatement:\ndon't use the grace period or your landlord won't have that much respect for you",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, it is suggested to read the lease to see if there is any grace period for making payments.\n[Extraction] However, there is no mention of not using the grace period to gain respect from the landlord.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCôte d'Ivoire's President Laurent Gbagbo promulgated new election laws on July 14, including the creation of an independent electoral commission to oversee the presidential vote, which is slated for October 30.\n\nStatement:\nGbagbo wants there to be an independent electoral commission involved in the next presidential election. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCôte d'Ivoire's President Laurent Gbagbo promulgated new election laws on July 14, including the creation of an independent electoral commission to oversee the presidential vote, which is slated for October 30.\n\nStatement:\nGbagbo wants there to be an independent electoral commission involved in the next presidential election. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Côte d'Ivoire's President Laurent Gbagbo promulgated new election laws, including the creation of an independent electoral commission to oversee the presidential vote.\n[Inference] This implies that Gbagbo wants there to be an independent electoral commission involved in the next presidential election, as he created a law for its creation.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe budgetary measures include tax relief for interest on all student loans, interest relief for more graduates, extended repayment periods for those who need them, extended interest relief periods for those who remain in financial difficulty and reductions in loan principal for those who still face financial difficulty.\n\nStatement:\nThere are no extended repayment periods in the new budgetary measures",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe budgetary measures include tax relief for interest on all student loans, interest relief for more graduates, extended repayment periods for those who need them, extended interest relief periods for those who remain in financial difficulty and reductions in loan principal for those who still face financial difficulty.\n\nStatement:\nThere are no extended repayment periods in the new budgetary measures",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the budgetary measures include extended repayment periods for those who need them.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nGraham (back) is not listed on the Nets' injury report ahead of Tuesday's game against Chicago, Greg Logan of Newsday reports. Graham was held out of Monday's loss to Boston due to a minor back issue, but he'll be back to availability on the second night of a back-to-back set. Graham had started the previous seven games, averaging 7.1 points and 4.0 rebounds in 27.4 minutes over that span.\n\nStatement:\nChicago does not play on Tuesday.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nGraham (back) is not listed on the Nets' injury report ahead of Tuesday's game against Chicago, Greg Logan of Newsday reports. Graham was held out of Monday's loss to Boston due to a minor back issue, but he'll be back to availability on the second night of a back-to-back set. Graham had started the previous seven games, averaging 7.1 points and 4.0 rebounds in 27.4 minutes over that span.\n\nStatement:\nChicago does not play on Tuesday.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Graham is not listed on the Nets' injury report ahead of Tuesday's game against Chicago.\n[Inference] This implies that Chicago does play on Tuesday, as they have a game scheduled against the Nets.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nFrederick \"Fred\" Moore Vinson (January 22, 1890 – September 8, 1953) was an American Democratic politician who served the United States in all three branches of government. The most prominent member of the Vinson political family, he was the 53rd United States Secretary of the Treasury and the 13th Chief Justice of the United States.\n\nStatement:\nHe was the least known out of the Vinson political family.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nFrederick \"Fred\" Moore Vinson (January 22, 1890 – September 8, 1953) was an American Democratic politician who served the United States in all three branches of government. The most prominent member of the Vinson political family, he was the 53rd United States Secretary of the Treasury and the 13th Chief Justice of the United States.\n\nStatement:\nHe was the least known out of the Vinson political family.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Frederick \"Fred\" Moore Vinson was the most prominent member of the Vinson political family.\n[Inference] This implies that he was not the least known out of the Vinson political family, but rather the most well-known.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWell, it starts with enforcing law. When you say loud and clear to somebody if you're going to carry a gun illegally, we're going to arrest you. If you're going to sell a gun illegally, you need to be arrested. If you commit a crime with a gun, there needs to be absolute certainty in the law.\n\nStatement:\nCarrying a gun illegally can get you arrested.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWell, it starts with enforcing law. When you say loud and clear to somebody if you're going to carry a gun illegally, we're going to arrest you. If you're going to sell a gun illegally, you need to be arrested. If you commit a crime with a gun, there needs to be absolute certainty in the law.\n\nStatement:\nCarrying a gun illegally can get you arrested.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, it states that \"if you're going to carry a gun illegally, we're going to arrest you.\"\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nJean Rhys, CBE ( ; 24 August 1890 – 14 May 1979), born Ella Gwendolyn Rees Williams, was a mid-20th-century novelist who was born and grew up in the Caribbean island of Dominica, though she was mainly resident in England from the age of 16. She is best known for her novel \"Wide Sargasso Sea\" (1966), written as a prequel to Charlotte Brontë's \"Jane Eyre\".\n\nStatement:\nJean Rhys has been to Haworth",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nJean Rhys, CBE ( ; 24 August 1890 – 14 May 1979), born Ella Gwendolyn Rees Williams, was a mid-20th-century novelist who was born and grew up in the Caribbean island of Dominica, though she was mainly resident in England from the age of 16. She is best known for her novel \"Wide Sargasso Sea\" (1966), written as a prequel to Charlotte Brontë's \"Jane Eyre\".\n\nStatement:\nJean Rhys has been to Haworth",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, there is no information about Jean Rhys visiting Haworth.\n[Inference] Although Haworth is related to the Brontë sisters, the document only mentions Charlotte Brontë's novel \"Jane Eyre\" as an inspiration for Jean Rhys' work, but it does not state that she visited Haworth.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBecky Ann Baker (born February 17, 1953) is an American actress who is known for her portrayal of Jean Weir on NBC's Emmy Award-winning \"Freaks and Geeks\" and for her role as Loreen Horvath on HBO's Emmy Award-winning \"Girls\", for which she received a Primetime Emmy nomination.\n\nStatement:\nBecky Ann Baker contains no q",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBecky Ann Baker (born February 17, 1953) is an American actress who is known for her portrayal of Jean Weir on NBC's Emmy Award-winning \"Freaks and Geeks\" and for her role as Loreen Horvath on HBO's Emmy Award-winning \"Girls\", for which she received a Primetime Emmy nomination.\n\nStatement:\nBecky Ann Baker contains no q",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Becky Ann Baker is an American actress.\n[Inference] The document provides the name \"Becky Ann Baker\" which does not contain the letter \"q\".\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe Award<br>Every year Crystal's company gave out an Employee of the Year award. Crystal wanted that award. She worked hard all year to get nominated. At the ceremony, she nervously waited for them to announce the winner. Crystal thanked her whole department when she got the award.\n\nStatement:\nCrystal's company gave out employee of the year only to men",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe Award<br>Every year Crystal's company gave out an Employee of the Year award. Crystal wanted that award. She worked hard all year to get nominated. At the ceremony, she nervously waited for them to announce the winner. Crystal thanked her whole department when she got the award.\n\nStatement:\nCrystal's company gave out employee of the year only to men",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Crystal's company gave out an Employee of the Year award every year.\n[Extraction] Crystal, who is presumably a woman, worked hard all year to get nominated and ultimately won the award.\n[Inference] This implies that the award is not exclusive to men.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\n20th Century spokesman Rick Dinon said that between the time it applied for the rate increase and changed its mind, the estimated quake losses had ballooned by several hundred million dollars.\n\nStatement:\nThis takes place in the 20th century.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\n20th Century spokesman Rick Dinon said that between the time it applied for the rate increase and changed its mind, the estimated quake losses had ballooned by several hundred million dollars.\n\nStatement:\nThis takes place in the 20th century.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the document mentions \"20th Century spokesman Rick Dinon\", which refers to the insurance company's name, not the time period.\n[Inference] The document does not provide information about the specific time period in which the event takes place.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to get addicted to exercise<br>Enjoy your exercise. Engaging in physical activities that you enjoy will transform exercise into a hobby rather than pure calorie burning. Everyone is interested in different levels of intensity in their workout.\n\nStatement:\nTreating workouts like a game rather than a mechanical exercise is not beneficial .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to get addicted to exercise<br>Enjoy your exercise. Engaging in physical activities that you enjoy will transform exercise into a hobby rather than pure calorie burning. Everyone is interested in different levels of intensity in their workout.\n\nStatement:\nTreating workouts like a game rather than a mechanical exercise is not beneficial .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Enjoying your exercise and engaging in physical activities that you enjoy will transform exercise into a hobby rather than pure calorie burning.\n[Inference] This implies that treating workouts as an enjoyable activity, rather than just a mechanical exercise, is beneficial.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLast to the race<br>Susie hated running. Yet her friend challenged her to a race. So she felt obliged. She ran as fast she could. Yet finished last.\n\nStatement:\nSusie's friend strained a muscle during the race, so Susie won.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLast to the race<br>Susie hated running. Yet her friend challenged her to a race. So she felt obliged. She ran as fast she could. Yet finished last.\n\nStatement:\nSusie's friend strained a muscle during the race, so Susie won.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Susie ran as fast as she could, yet finished last.\n[Inference] This implies that Susie's friend finished before her, and therefore, there is no evidence to suggest Susie won.\n[Extraction] Additionally, the document does not mention anything about Susie's friend straining a muscle during the race.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nA brother of Colombia's education minister has been killed by Marxist rebels who kidnapped him three years ago.\n\nStatement:\nA sibling of the Colombia education minister was murdered",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nA brother of Colombia's education minister has been killed by Marxist rebels who kidnapped him three years ago.\n\nStatement:\nA sibling of the Colombia education minister was murdered",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, A brother of Colombia's education minister has been killed.\n[Inference] A brother is a type of sibling.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWill the dispute settlement mechanism of the collective agreement apply, or does the government envisage an adjudication mechanism such that affected workers will be able to apply to some third party for a determination as to whether a given adjustment program or benefit under a given program is fair?\n\nStatement:\nThis person knows how to ask a question.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWill the dispute settlement mechanism of the collective agreement apply, or does the government envisage an adjudication mechanism such that affected workers will be able to apply to some third party for a determination as to whether a given adjustment program or benefit under a given program is fair?\n\nStatement:\nThis person knows how to ask a question.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the text is a question about a dispute settlement mechanism.\n[Inference] The question is clear, specific, and well-structured, suggesting that the person asking it is articulate and knowledgeable about the topic.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPerhaps those who argue that the Nisga'a final agreement cannot be given full effect without first amending the Constitution of Canada just do not understand the process and do not understand the value of a negotiated reconciliation of aboriginal rights within the Canadian federation.\n\nStatement:\nPeople who argue that the final agreement canoot be given full effect without first amending the constitution don't understand the process",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPerhaps those who argue that the Nisga'a final agreement cannot be given full effect without first amending the Constitution of Canada just do not understand the process and do not understand the value of a negotiated reconciliation of aboriginal rights within the Canadian federation.\n\nStatement:\nPeople who argue that the final agreement canoot be given full effect without first amending the constitution don't understand the process",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, it is stated that perhaps those who argue that the Nisga'a final agreement cannot be given full effect without first amending the Constitution of Canada just do not understand the process.\n[Extraction] The document also mentions that they do not understand the value of a negotiated reconciliation of aboriginal rights within the Canadian federation.\n[Inference] However, the statement only mentions that they don't understand the process, omitting the part about not understanding the value of a negotiated reconciliation.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAround 130 flights were cancelled during a strike held on 19 January, and others were cancelled in the days that followed. When the flight assistants announced a further 24-hour for 23 January, the Italian Guarantee Authority (Commissione di Garanzia) which regulates strikes in essential public services (under the terms of laws no. 194/1990 and no. 83/2000) (IT0004266F) accused the unions of breaching the legal provision that 10 days must elapse between one strike and the next.\n\nStatement:\nFlight assistants were part of the striking workforce.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAround 130 flights were cancelled during a strike held on 19 January, and others were cancelled in the days that followed. When the flight assistants announced a further 24-hour for 23 January, the Italian Guarantee Authority (Commissione di Garanzia) which regulates strikes in essential public services (under the terms of laws no. 194/1990 and no. 83/2000) (IT0004266F) accused the unions of breaching the legal provision that 10 days must elapse between one strike and the next.\n\nStatement:\nFlight assistants were part of the striking workforce.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, When the flight assistants announced a further 24-hour for 23 January, it implies that they were involved in the strike.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nMALABO Feb 5 The African Nations Cup semi-final was halted eight minutes from time on Thursday amid violent scenes as Ghana supporters sought refuge on the pitch while missiles rained down from angry Equatorial Guinea fans. Ghana were leading 3-0 in a tempestuous semi-final against the tournament hosts. (Reporting by Mark Gleeson; Editing by Ken Ferris)\n\nStatement:\nThe african nations cup was stopped after violent scenes",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nMALABO Feb 5 The African Nations Cup semi-final was halted eight minutes from time on Thursday amid violent scenes as Ghana supporters sought refuge on the pitch while missiles rained down from angry Equatorial Guinea fans. Ghana were leading 3-0 in a tempestuous semi-final against the tournament hosts. (Reporting by Mark Gleeson; Editing by Ken Ferris)\n\nStatement:\nThe african nations cup was stopped after violent scenes",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the African Nations Cup semi-final was halted eight minutes from time amid violent scenes.\n[Inference] The document states that missiles rained down from angry Equatorial Guinea fans and Ghana supporters sought refuge on the pitch, indicating that the violent scenes were the reason for the halt.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nI shed quarts of tears while writing it , and the other girls shed gallons while I read it .<br>Jane Andrews ' mother scolded her frightfully because she had so many handkerchiefs in the wash that week .<br>It 's a harrowing tale of the wanderings of a Methodist minister 's wife .\n\nStatement:\nJane Andrews went to college ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nI shed quarts of tears while writing it , and the other girls shed gallons while I read it .<br>Jane Andrews ' mother scolded her frightfully because she had so many handkerchiefs in the wash that week .<br>It 's a harrowing tale of the wanderings of a Methodist minister 's wife .\n\nStatement:\nJane Andrews went to college ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Jane Andrews' mother scolded her frightfully because she had so many handkerchiefs in the wash that week.\n[Extraction] However, the document does not state that Jane Andrews went to college.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTilda<br>For years Jack had stubbornly refused to replace his dying truck. He cursed it and kicked it and swore to light it on fire. Still Jack refused. His wife had chosen this truck and named it Tilda. Tilda outlived Jack's wife and she helped him remember the good days.\n\nStatement:\nJack cursed and kicked his truck.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTilda<br>For years Jack had stubbornly refused to replace his dying truck. He cursed it and kicked it and swore to light it on fire. Still Jack refused. His wife had chosen this truck and named it Tilda. Tilda outlived Jack's wife and she helped him remember the good days.\n\nStatement:\nJack cursed and kicked his truck.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Jack cursed it and kicked it and swore to light it on fire.\n[Inference] The \"it\" refers to the truck, which is named Tilda.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAssassin's Creed is an action-adventure stealth video game developed by Ubisoft Montreal and published by Ubisoft. It is the first installment in the \"Assassin's Creed\" series. The game was released for PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 in November 2007, and was made available on Microsoft Windows in April 2008.\n\nStatement:\nassassins creed was available to play from november 2007 ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAssassin's Creed is an action-adventure stealth video game developed by Ubisoft Montreal and published by Ubisoft. It is the first installment in the \"Assassin's Creed\" series. The game was released for PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 in November 2007, and was made available on Microsoft Windows in April 2008.\n\nStatement:\nassassins creed was available to play from november 2007 ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, The game was released for PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 in November 2007.\n[Extraction] However, it was made available on Microsoft Windows in April 2008.\n[Inference] This implies that it was not available to play on all platforms from November 2007.\n[Conclusion] However, since it was available on some platforms from November 2007, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nVic & Anthony’s is an American steakhouse restaurant chain with locations in Downtown Houston, ]and inside the Golden Nugget Casinos in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. A fourth location is scheduled to open inside the new Golden Nugget Lake Charles in late 2014. Vic & Anthony’s is owned and operated by Landry’s, Inc.\n\nStatement:\nVic & Anthony's does not have a houston location",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nVic & Anthony’s is an American steakhouse restaurant chain with locations in Downtown Houston, ]and inside the Golden Nugget Casinos in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. A fourth location is scheduled to open inside the new Golden Nugget Lake Charles in late 2014. Vic & Anthony’s is owned and operated by Landry’s, Inc.\n\nStatement:\nVic & Anthony's does not have a houston location",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Vic & Anthony’s is an American steakhouse restaurant chain with locations in Downtown Houston.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nDaredevil<br>Josh loved doing skateboard tricks to grab people's attention. But his tricks became more and more dangerous. While at a skate park, he announced he would do a backflip off a ramp. And a large scene gathered around him. But Josh ended up in the hospital.\n\nStatement:\nNo one has ever watched Josh do tricks .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nDaredevil<br>Josh loved doing skateboard tricks to grab people's attention. But his tricks became more and more dangerous. While at a skate park, he announced he would do a backflip off a ramp. And a large scene gathered around him. But Josh ended up in the hospital.\n\nStatement:\nNo one has ever watched Josh do tricks .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Josh loved doing skateboard tricks to grab people's attention.\n[Inference] This implies that people have watched Josh do tricks, as he did them to grab attention.\n[Extraction] Additionally, the document states that a large scene gathered around him at the skate park.\n[Inference] This also implies that people were watching Josh as he prepared to do a backflip.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nJohn Halsey (born 23 February 1945 in Highgate) is a rock drummer, best known for his appearance as Barrington Womble (\"Barry Wom\") in The Rutles, leading to his playing with Neil Innes's band Fatso and appearing in the television film \"All You Need is Cash\" (1978).\n\nStatement:\nJohn Halsey was born in the same month that has Valentine's Day.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nJohn Halsey (born 23 February 1945 in Highgate) is a rock drummer, best known for his appearance as Barrington Womble (\"Barry Wom\") in The Rutles, leading to his playing with Neil Innes's band Fatso and appearing in the television film \"All You Need is Cash\" (1978).\n\nStatement:\nJohn Halsey was born in the same month that has Valentine's Day.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, John Halsey was born on 23 February 1945.\n[Inference] Valentine's Day is on February 14th, so February is indeed the same month as Valentine's Day.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nKiels Mountain is a suburb of the Sunshine Coast Region in South East Queensland, Australia about 100 kilometres north of Brisbane. At the 2011 Australian Census the suburb recorded a population of 657. The Bruce Highway defines the western boundary and Eudlo Creek passes through the southeast tip of Kiels Mountain.\n\nStatement:\nKiels Mountain can be found in the Southern Hemisphere.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nKiels Mountain is a suburb of the Sunshine Coast Region in South East Queensland, Australia about 100 kilometres north of Brisbane. At the 2011 Australian Census the suburb recorded a population of 657. The Bruce Highway defines the western boundary and Eudlo Creek passes through the southeast tip of Kiels Mountain.\n\nStatement:\nKiels Mountain can be found in the Southern Hemisphere.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Kiels Mountain is located in South East Queensland, Australia.\n[Inference] Since Australia is in the Southern Hemisphere, Kiels Mountain must be in the Southern Hemisphere.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLuciano Chailly (born Ferrara, January 19, 1920 – died Milan, December 24, 2002) was an Italian composer and arts administrator of French descent. He was the father of harpist Cecilia Chailly, conductor Riccardo Chailly and journalist Floriana Chailly. As a composer, Chailly was best known for his operas, many of which were composed to libretti by Dino Buzzati.\n\nStatement:\nLuciano Chailly had no children",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLuciano Chailly (born Ferrara, January 19, 1920 – died Milan, December 24, 2002) was an Italian composer and arts administrator of French descent. He was the father of harpist Cecilia Chailly, conductor Riccardo Chailly and journalist Floriana Chailly. As a composer, Chailly was best known for his operas, many of which were composed to libretti by Dino Buzzati.\n\nStatement:\nLuciano Chailly had no children",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Luciano Chailly was the father of harpist Cecilia Chailly, conductor Riccardo Chailly and journalist Floriana Chailly.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nSomerset v Stewart (1772) 98 ER 499 (aka \"Somersett's case\", or in State Trials v.XX \"Sommersett v Steuart\") is a famous judgment of the English Court of King's Bench in 1772, which held that chattel slavery was unsupported by the common law in England and Wales, although the position elsewhere in the British Empire was left ambiguous. Lord Mansfield decided that:\n\nStatement:\nBritish Empire was ruled by a King in 1772",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nSomerset v Stewart (1772) 98 ER 499 (aka \"Somersett's case\", or in State Trials v.XX \"Sommersett v Steuart\") is a famous judgment of the English Court of King's Bench in 1772, which held that chattel slavery was unsupported by the common law in England and Wales, although the position elsewhere in the British Empire was left ambiguous. Lord Mansfield decided that:\n\nStatement:\nBritish Empire was ruled by a King in 1772",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the case was decided by the English Court of King's Bench in 1772.\n[Inference] The name \"King's Bench\" implies that the British Empire was a monarchy in 1772, which means it was ruled by a King.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nDonald Trump views the mainstream press with contempt, and the mainstream press returns the favor. Or is it the other way around? Just as the president has trouble distinguishing between negative press coverage and \"fake news,\" the journalists who cover him tend to treat every inaccurate, unfounded, or even debatable statement he makes as a lie. And that mistake, suggests Jacob Sullum, clouds the judgment and damages the credibility of reporters and commentators who aspire to skepticism but too often settle for reflexive disbelief. View this article.\n\nStatement:\nJacob Sullum thinks the press loves Donald Trump. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nDonald Trump views the mainstream press with contempt, and the mainstream press returns the favor. Or is it the other way around? Just as the president has trouble distinguishing between negative press coverage and \"fake news,\" the journalists who cover him tend to treat every inaccurate, unfounded, or even debatable statement he makes as a lie. And that mistake, suggests Jacob Sullum, clouds the judgment and damages the credibility of reporters and commentators who aspire to skepticism but too often settle for reflexive disbelief. View this article.\n\nStatement:\nJacob Sullum thinks the press loves Donald Trump. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Jacob Sullum suggests that the journalists who cover Donald Trump tend to treat every inaccurate statement as a lie, which clouds their judgment and damages their credibility.\n[Extraction] The document also states that Donald Trump views the mainstream press with contempt, and the mainstream press returns the favor.\n[Inference] This implies that Jacob Sullum does not think the press loves Donald Trump, but rather that they have a negative view of him.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLate in '04 my daughter came home from school, and I was discussing kind of what was going on in the district with her. And she looked at me and she said, Well, Mom, evolution is a lie, what kind of Christian are you, anyway, which I found to be very upsetting.\n\nStatement:\nThe mom in the vignette was disconcerted by what her daughter said to her back in 2004.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLate in '04 my daughter came home from school, and I was discussing kind of what was going on in the district with her. And she looked at me and she said, Well, Mom, evolution is a lie, what kind of Christian are you, anyway, which I found to be very upsetting.\n\nStatement:\nThe mom in the vignette was disconcerted by what her daughter said to her back in 2004.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the daughter said to her mom, \"Well, Mom, evolution is a lie, what kind of Christian are you, anyway\", which the mom found to be \"very upsetting\".\n[Inference] Being \"very upsetting\" implies that the mom was disconcerted by what her daughter said.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWilliam Beck is a Welsh-born actor, best known for his appearances on television in the United Kingdom as Royston White on BBC One drama series \"Robin Hood\", and Dylan Keogh on BBC One drama series \"Casualty\". He has also appeared in popular feature films such as \"Snatch\", directed by Guy Ritchie.\n\nStatement:\nWilliam Beck is no longer alive",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWilliam Beck is a Welsh-born actor, best known for his appearances on television in the United Kingdom as Royston White on BBC One drama series \"Robin Hood\", and Dylan Keogh on BBC One drama series \"Casualty\". He has also appeared in popular feature films such as \"Snatch\", directed by Guy Ritchie.\n\nStatement:\nWilliam Beck is no longer alive",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, William Beck is described as a Welsh-born actor.\n[Inference] There is no information in the document indicating that William Beck is deceased.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTORONTO, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Canada’s main stock index fell on Tuesday as a decline in shares of energy producers, following weaker oil prices, helped offset optimism surrounding Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen’s comments on the U.S. central bank’s monetary policy direction. The Toronto Stock Exchange’s S&P/TSX composite index unofficially closed down 35.29 points, or 0.23 percent, at 15,164.97. Six of the 10 main sectors on the index fell. (Reporting by John Tilak; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)\n\nStatement:\nThe story is from the United States",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTORONTO, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Canada’s main stock index fell on Tuesday as a decline in shares of energy producers, following weaker oil prices, helped offset optimism surrounding Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen’s comments on the U.S. central bank’s monetary policy direction. The Toronto Stock Exchange’s S&P/TSX composite index unofficially closed down 35.29 points, or 0.23 percent, at 15,164.97. Six of the 10 main sectors on the index fell. (Reporting by John Tilak; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)\n\nStatement:\nThe story is from the United States",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the location mentioned at the beginning of the story is TORONTO.\n[Inference] Toronto is a major city in Canada, not the United States.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAll ministers I met with this week know it is our obligation to show leadership and to work together to come up with a package of risk management tools that the government could be involved in to encourage producers to get involved in what I refer to as commercial risk management.\n\nStatement:\nthe government will be a component to the ministers' development of a package of risk management tools that will encourage producers to get involved in commercial risk management.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAll ministers I met with this week know it is our obligation to show leadership and to work together to come up with a package of risk management tools that the government could be involved in to encourage producers to get involved in what I refer to as commercial risk management.\n\nStatement:\nthe government will be a component to the ministers' development of a package of risk management tools that will encourage producers to get involved in commercial risk management.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, it is mentioned that it is the ministers' obligation to work together to come up with a package of risk management tools that the government could be involved in.\n[Extraction] The goal of this package is to encourage producers to get involved in what is referred to as commercial risk management.\n[Inference] This implies that the government will be a component in the development of this package, as it could be involved in it.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLet me just tell you who the jury is. The people of Texas. There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four-year terms, and that was me. And I was able to do so with a lot of Democrat votes, nearly 50% of the Hispanic vote, about 27% of the African-American vote, because people know I'm a conservative person and a compassionate person.\n\nStatement:\nThe governor is from a large state",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLet me just tell you who the jury is. The people of Texas. There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four-year terms, and that was me. And I was able to do so with a lot of Democrat votes, nearly 50% of the Hispanic vote, about 27% of the African-American vote, because people know I'm a conservative person and a compassionate person.\n\nStatement:\nThe governor is from a large state",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the governor mentions that he is from Texas.\n[Inference] Texas is a large state in the United States.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCatherine Marie Cortez Masto (born March 29, 1964) is an American attorney and politician who is the junior United States Senator from Nevada. She is a member of the Democratic Party. She previously served as the 32nd Attorney General of Nevada from 2007 to 2015.\n\nStatement:\nCatherine Marie Cortez Masto was born in 1964",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCatherine Marie Cortez Masto (born March 29, 1964) is an American attorney and politician who is the junior United States Senator from Nevada. She is a member of the Democratic Party. She previously served as the 32nd Attorney General of Nevada from 2007 to 2015.\n\nStatement:\nCatherine Marie Cortez Masto was born in 1964",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Catherine Marie Cortez Masto was born on March 29, 1964.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to shop for speakers<br>Decide how you'll use the speakers. The variety of speaker builds suits individual speakers for different tasks. For casual music listening, a pair of bookshelf speakers would be more than enough.\n\nStatement:\nA person who listens to music but doesn't have any unusual circumstances could use bookshelf speakers .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to shop for speakers<br>Decide how you'll use the speakers. The variety of speaker builds suits individual speakers for different tasks. For casual music listening, a pair of bookshelf speakers would be more than enough.\n\nStatement:\nA person who listens to music but doesn't have any unusual circumstances could use bookshelf speakers .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, for casual music listening, a pair of bookshelf speakers would be more than enough.\n[Inference] This implies that a person who listens to music but doesn't have any unusual circumstances could use bookshelf speakers, as casual music listening is a typical use case.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to ask for what you want<br>Decide what you want. If you don't know what you want, you can't ask for it. Think about your desires until you are no longer ambivalent or confused about what you want.\n\nStatement:\nThink about your desires until you are completely confused about what you want.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to ask for what you want<br>Decide what you want. If you don't know what you want, you can't ask for it. Think about your desires until you are no longer ambivalent or confused about what you want.\n\nStatement:\nThink about your desires until you are completely confused about what you want.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Think about your desires until you are no longer ambivalent or confused about what you want.\n[Inference] This implies that the goal is to achieve clarity about one's desires, not to become more confused.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPresent in chambers are counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendants, and in addition to that, let me ask that you enter your appearances specially, presumably as counsel for the individuals we referred to in our orders collectively as \"reporters.\"\n\nStatement:\nThe reporters are individual persons who form a group collective.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPresent in chambers are counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendants, and in addition to that, let me ask that you enter your appearances specially, presumably as counsel for the individuals we referred to in our orders collectively as \"reporters.\"\n\nStatement:\nThe reporters are individual persons who form a group collective.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the judge refers to \"the individuals we referred to in our orders collectively as 'reporters'\".\n[Inference] This implies that the reporters are individual persons who are grouped together collectively under the term \"reporters\".\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWright sat out Wednesday's practice with an undisclosed injury, Mike Rothstein of ESPN.com reports. Wright joined injured fellow tight ends Eric Ebron (hamstring) and Cole Wick (undisclosed) on the sideline. The Rutgers product is competing with Wick, Darren Fells, and rookie Michael Roberts to back up presumed starter Ebron.\n\nStatement:\nEric Ebron had to sit out Wednesday's practice as well due to a hamstring injury.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nWright sat out Wednesday's practice with an undisclosed injury, Mike Rothstein of ESPN.com reports. Wright joined injured fellow tight ends Eric Ebron (hamstring) and Cole Wick (undisclosed) on the sideline. The Rutgers product is competing with Wick, Darren Fells, and rookie Michael Roberts to back up presumed starter Ebron.\n\nStatement:\nEric Ebron had to sit out Wednesday's practice as well due to a hamstring injury.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Wright sat out Wednesday's practice with an undisclosed injury.\n[Extraction] Eric Ebron was also on the sideline with a hamstring injury.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nNew York, NY – For the third straight year, Latino Sports photographer Jeremías Pérez Artiga covered this weekend’s Professional Bull Riders annual New York event, Monster Energy Buck Off at the Garden. An avid bull riding fan, Jeremías had the opportunity to be close to the action as well as observe what happens behind the scenes. With that said enjoy the photos from Madison Square Garden!\n\nStatement:\nThe event took place in Chicago.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nNew York, NY – For the third straight year, Latino Sports photographer Jeremías Pérez Artiga covered this weekend’s Professional Bull Riders annual New York event, Monster Energy Buck Off at the Garden. An avid bull riding fan, Jeremías had the opportunity to be close to the action as well as observe what happens behind the scenes. With that said enjoy the photos from Madison Square Garden!\n\nStatement:\nThe event took place in Chicago.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the event took place at Madison Square Garden in New York, NY.\n[Inference] Madison Square Garden is a venue located in New York City, not Chicago.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to wax facial hair (girls )<br>Consider buying honey wax/sugar wax/some kind of waxing-related hardening liquid. Honey wax is very good, takes the hair off clean, and leaves skin incredibly soft and smooth. Although a little more expensive, it is worth it! If you buy some wax, other than make it, most come with big cuttable cloth pieces.\n\nStatement:\nwax was used by bryan",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to wax facial hair (girls )<br>Consider buying honey wax/sugar wax/some kind of waxing-related hardening liquid. Honey wax is very good, takes the hair off clean, and leaves skin incredibly soft and smooth. Although a little more expensive, it is worth it! If you buy some wax, other than make it, most come with big cuttable cloth pieces.\n\nStatement:\nwax was used by bryan",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, there is no information about Bryan using wax.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nKenichi Hagiwara (萩原健一; \"Hagiwara Ken'ichi\", born 26 July 1950 in Omiya, Saitama, Japan), also known as Sho-Ken, was the lead singer of The Tempters , the \"bad boys\" of the Group Sounds Japan pop scene in the mid and late 1960s. A teen idol with a legion of loyal fans, Hagiwara was known for his good looks and arrogance, which appealed to both young male and female Japanese fans.\n\nStatement:\nKenichi Hagiwara is a singer",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nKenichi Hagiwara (萩原健一; \"Hagiwara Ken'ichi\", born 26 July 1950 in Omiya, Saitama, Japan), also known as Sho-Ken, was the lead singer of The Tempters , the \"bad boys\" of the Group Sounds Japan pop scene in the mid and late 1960s. A teen idol with a legion of loyal fans, Hagiwara was known for his good looks and arrogance, which appealed to both young male and female Japanese fans.\n\nStatement:\nKenichi Hagiwara is a singer",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Kenichi Hagiwara was the lead singer of The Tempters.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLucinda's New Gown<br>Lucinda loved to go out dancing at night. Lucinda had many different outfits to wear to her dances. One evening, she decided to go shopping for an outfit in the city. She passed by the window of a store and saw a nice gown. She bought it at once, and wore it to her dance that night.\n\nStatement:\nLucinda hated dancing.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLucinda's New Gown<br>Lucinda loved to go out dancing at night. Lucinda had many different outfits to wear to her dances. One evening, she decided to go shopping for an outfit in the city. She passed by the window of a store and saw a nice gown. She bought it at once, and wore it to her dance that night.\n\nStatement:\nLucinda hated dancing.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Lucinda loved to go out dancing at night.\n[Inference] This implies that she enjoyed dancing.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nU.S. policy on drug trafficking is not consistent with the need to put an end and actively repress the consumption of drugs. The solution is not based on the destruction of a native plant, coca, in the continent, but on an active fight against the Colombian drug mafia, which has created a great money and crime empire in Colombia with powerful ramifications outside its borders.\n\nStatement:\nThere is no need to repress the consumption of drugs . ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nU.S. policy on drug trafficking is not consistent with the need to put an end and actively repress the consumption of drugs. The solution is not based on the destruction of a native plant, coca, in the continent, but on an active fight against the Colombian drug mafia, which has created a great money and crime empire in Colombia with powerful ramifications outside its borders.\n\nStatement:\nThere is no need to repress the consumption of drugs . ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, U.S. policy on drug trafficking is not consistent with the need to put an end and actively repress the consumption of drugs.\n[Inference] This implies that there is a need to repress the consumption of drugs, according to the document.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\n\"Where Is the Feeling?\" is a song by Australian recording artist and songwriter Kylie Minogue, taken from her fifth studio album \"Kylie Minogue\" (1994). The song was written by Wilf Smarties and Jayn Hanna, while production was handled by Brothers in Rhythm. It was released on 10 July 1995 as the third and final single from her self-titled album \"Kylie Minogue\".\n\nStatement:\nKylie Minogue is both the name of a singer and the name of an Album.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\n\"Where Is the Feeling?\" is a song by Australian recording artist and songwriter Kylie Minogue, taken from her fifth studio album \"Kylie Minogue\" (1994). The song was written by Wilf Smarties and Jayn Hanna, while production was handled by Brothers in Rhythm. It was released on 10 July 1995 as the third and final single from her self-titled album \"Kylie Minogue\".\n\nStatement:\nKylie Minogue is both the name of a singer and the name of an Album.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the song \"Where Is the Feeling?\" is taken from Kylie Minogue's fifth studio album \"Kylie Minogue\" (1994).\n[Inference] This implies that \"Kylie Minogue\" is the name of both the singer and the album.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBut the best way to protect our citizens from guns is to prosecute those who commit crimes with guns. And that's why early in my administration I called the attorney general and the U. S. attorneys and said: Put together a task force all around the country to prosecute those who commit crimes with guns. And the prosecutions are up by about 68 percent -- I believe -- is the number.\n\nStatement:\nthe prosecutions are up by more than 53.98%.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBut the best way to protect our citizens from guns is to prosecute those who commit crimes with guns. And that's why early in my administration I called the attorney general and the U. S. attorneys and said: Put together a task force all around the country to prosecute those who commit crimes with guns. And the prosecutions are up by about 68 percent -- I believe -- is the number.\n\nStatement:\nthe prosecutions are up by more than 53.98%.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the prosecutions are up by about 68 percent.\n[Inference] 68 percent is indeed more than 53.98%.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPLEASANT ISLAND, AK--Whale watchers in Alaska got the surprise of a lifetime recently. They were patiently waiting to see humpbacks off the coast of Pleasant Island when all of a sudden a huge whale surprises them. The humpback whale leaped out of the water and nearly made itself at home in the boat. Laughter broke out among the startled boaters. Despite getting drenched in water, the whale watchers were happy to get the surprise of a lifetime.\n\nStatement:\nWhale watchers has a q",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPLEASANT ISLAND, AK--Whale watchers in Alaska got the surprise of a lifetime recently. They were patiently waiting to see humpbacks off the coast of Pleasant Island when all of a sudden a huge whale surprises them. The humpback whale leaped out of the water and nearly made itself at home in the boat. Laughter broke out among the startled boaters. Despite getting drenched in water, the whale watchers were happy to get the surprise of a lifetime.\n\nStatement:\nWhale watchers has a q",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the document does not provide a complete statement to compare with \"Whale watchers has a q\".\n[Conclusion] However, it seems that the statement is incomplete. If we consider the statement as incomplete, we should consider the rest of the statement. As there is no complete statement provided, we can conclude based on a general assumption. Assuming the complete statement is \"Whale watchers has a quiet moment\", the document does not mention that they had a quiet moment; it actually states that \"Laughter broke out among the startled boaters\". Hence the statement would be [Not Attributable] or [Contradictory]. However, as the statement is incomplete, we cannot make any accurate conclusion.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nRemnant newspaper 1 hour ago Follow Chat Remnant Scripture Study. Father continues his series on the traditional teaching and understanding of Scripture's most fundamental lessons. This week we learn all about the many epiphanies of Christ which are celebrated during Christmastide.\n\nStatement:\nThis week we learn all about few ephiphanies of Christ.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nRemnant newspaper 1 hour ago Follow Chat Remnant Scripture Study. Father continues his series on the traditional teaching and understanding of Scripture's most fundamental lessons. This week we learn all about the many epiphanies of Christ which are celebrated during Christmastide.\n\nStatement:\nThis week we learn all about few ephiphanies of Christ.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, this week we learn all about the many epiphanies of Christ.\n[Inference] The statement says \"few epiphanies\" which contradicts the document that says \"many epiphanies\".\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nDesign<br>Tim and Alice were getting married. They bought a brand new home. They hired an interior decorator. They loved the work the designer did. They were very happy with their new home.\n\nStatement:\ntim and alice never bought a home",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nDesign<br>Tim and Alice were getting married. They bought a brand new home. They hired an interior decorator. They loved the work the designer did. They were very happy with their new home.\n\nStatement:\ntim and alice never bought a home",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Tim and Alice bought a brand new home.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPhilip Morris cited strong volume gains in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, central and eastern Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Japan, Korea, Argentina and Brazil.\n\nStatement:\nArgentina smokers smoke as many cigarettes as smokers in Germany",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nPhilip Morris cited strong volume gains in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, central and eastern Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Japan, Korea, Argentina and Brazil.\n\nStatement:\nArgentina smokers smoke as many cigarettes as smokers in Germany",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Philip Morris cited strong volume gains in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, central and eastern Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Japan, Korea, Argentina, and Brazil.\n[Extraction] However, the document does not compare the number of cigarettes smoked by smokers in Argentina and Germany.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn an effort to boost Uganda's economy, the government has been investing in the agricultural sector by helping farmers afford the farm inputs they need with vouchers and money subsidies. However, the current system often proves to be obsolete, resulting in farmers losing money or using the money for personal purposes or renouncing altogether to the subsidy when faced with the confusing voucher application process. Evelyn Namara, Founder and CEO of Vouch Digital joins CNBC Africa for more. Advertisement\n\nStatement:\nUgandan farmers are spending a lot of money to farm.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn an effort to boost Uganda's economy, the government has been investing in the agricultural sector by helping farmers afford the farm inputs they need with vouchers and money subsidies. However, the current system often proves to be obsolete, resulting in farmers losing money or using the money for personal purposes or renouncing altogether to the subsidy when faced with the confusing voucher application process. Evelyn Namara, Founder and CEO of Vouch Digital joins CNBC Africa for more. Advertisement\n\nStatement:\nUgandan farmers are spending a lot of money to farm.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the government has been investing in the agricultural sector by helping farmers afford the farm inputs they need with vouchers and money subsidies.\n[Inference] This implies that farmers may not have enough money to afford the farm inputs, which is why the government is providing assistance.\n[Extraction] However, the document does not state that farmers are spending a lot of money to farm.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCharles Edward Huber (c. 1845–1904) was from a well-known family in Los Angeles, California, at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and served on the city's governing body, the Common Council, between 1873 and 1875. Near the end of his life he was engaged in several court cases and was sent to a state hospital for the mentally ill.\n\nStatement:\nhe was never involved in a case.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCharles Edward Huber (c. 1845–1904) was from a well-known family in Los Angeles, California, at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and served on the city's governing body, the Common Council, between 1873 and 1875. Near the end of his life he was engaged in several court cases and was sent to a state hospital for the mentally ill.\n\nStatement:\nhe was never involved in a case.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Near the end of his life he was engaged in several court cases.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCurrent Chelan County Deputy Prosecutor Allen Blackmon announced yesterday that he will seek the Chelan County District Court Judgeship currently held by Nancy Harmon who announced her retirement. Blackmon graduated from Wenatchee High School and then attended Wenatchee Valley College before graduating first from University of Washington and then receiving his Juris Doctor from Syracuse. According to a press release, Blackmon was hired as deputy prosecutor in 1996 and has handled more than 10,000 criminal cases in his career.\n\nStatement:\nBlackmon has handled at least 10,001 criminal cases in his career. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nCurrent Chelan County Deputy Prosecutor Allen Blackmon announced yesterday that he will seek the Chelan County District Court Judgeship currently held by Nancy Harmon who announced her retirement. Blackmon graduated from Wenatchee High School and then attended Wenatchee Valley College before graduating first from University of Washington and then receiving his Juris Doctor from Syracuse. According to a press release, Blackmon was hired as deputy prosecutor in 1996 and has handled more than 10,000 criminal cases in his career.\n\nStatement:\nBlackmon has handled at least 10,001 criminal cases in his career. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Blackmon has handled more than 10,000 criminal cases in his career.\n[Inference] This implies that the actual number of cases he has handled is at least 10,001.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to call india<br>Dial your country's exit code. Before you can place any international call, you need to dial a set of numbers that signifies to the telephone carrier that the phone number following it will be for someone in another country. [substeps] For instance, in the united states, the exit code is \" 011.\n\nStatement:\nto call india an exit code is required.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to call india<br>Dial your country's exit code. Before you can place any international call, you need to dial a set of numbers that signifies to the telephone carrier that the phone number following it will be for someone in another country. [substeps] For instance, in the united states, the exit code is \" 011.\n\nStatement:\nto call india an exit code is required.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Before you can place any international call, you need to dial a set of numbers that signifies to the telephone carrier that the phone number following it will be for someone in another country.\n[Extraction] The document specifically mentions that this set of numbers is the country's exit code.\n[Inference] Since calling India is an international call, an exit code is required to call India.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBANGKOK, June 16 (Reuters) - Thailand’s Charoen Pokphand Foods Pcl said on Tuesday it expected its money-losing shrimp business to recover from the third quarter of this year. Its shrimp sales for the full year would be about 20,000 tonnes, similar to last year‘s, company executive vice president Viboon Supakarapongkul told reporters. Viboon did not provide a full-year profit forecast for the shrimp business due to demand volatility. (Reporting by Khettiya Jittapong; Writing by Viparat Jantraprap; Editing by Christopher Cushing)\n\nStatement:\nViboon did not give reporters a profit forecast. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nBANGKOK, June 16 (Reuters) - Thailand’s Charoen Pokphand Foods Pcl said on Tuesday it expected its money-losing shrimp business to recover from the third quarter of this year. Its shrimp sales for the full year would be about 20,000 tonnes, similar to last year‘s, company executive vice president Viboon Supakarapongkul told reporters. Viboon did not provide a full-year profit forecast for the shrimp business due to demand volatility. (Reporting by Khettiya Jittapong; Writing by Viparat Jantraprap; Editing by Christopher Cushing)\n\nStatement:\nViboon did not give reporters a profit forecast. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Viboon did not provide a full-year profit forecast for the shrimp business due to demand volatility.\n[Inference] This implies that Viboon did not give reporters a profit forecast for the full year.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTrump orders review of visa programme to encourage hiring Americans KENOSHA, Wis. President Donald Trump on Tuesday ordered a review of the U.S. visa programme for bringing high-skilled foreign workers into the country, putting technology firms and the outsourcing companies that serve them on notice that possible changes may be ahead.\n\nStatement:\nImmigrants generally work for lower wages than Americans",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nTrump orders review of visa programme to encourage hiring Americans KENOSHA, Wis. President Donald Trump on Tuesday ordered a review of the U.S. visa programme for bringing high-skilled foreign workers into the country, putting technology firms and the outsourcing companies that serve them on notice that possible changes may be ahead.\n\nStatement:\nImmigrants generally work for lower wages than Americans",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, there is no information about immigrants generally working for lower wages than Americans.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe 42-year-old actor was outside a movie theater in central London's Leicester Square, doing press interviews, Sunday, when a man squirted Cruise with a water pistol disguised as a microphone, London's Metropolitan Police said.\n\nStatement:\nThe 32-year-old actor was outside a movie theater in central London's Leicester Square.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nThe 42-year-old actor was outside a movie theater in central London's Leicester Square, doing press interviews, Sunday, when a man squirted Cruise with a water pistol disguised as a microphone, London's Metropolitan Police said.\n\nStatement:\nThe 32-year-old actor was outside a movie theater in central London's Leicester Square.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, The 42-year-old actor was outside a movie theater in central London's Leicester Square.\n[Inference] The age of the actor mentioned in the document is 42, not 32.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn Greek mythology, Orthrus (Greek: Ὄρθρος , \"Orthros\") or Orthus (Greek: Ὄρθος , \"Orthos\") was, according to the mythographer Apollodorus, a two-headed dog who guarded Geryon's cattle and was killed by Heracles. He was the offspring of the monsters Echidna and Typhon, and the brother of Cerberus, who was also a multi-headed guard dog.\n\nStatement:\nCerberus was older than Orthrus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn Greek mythology, Orthrus (Greek: Ὄρθρος , \"Orthros\") or Orthus (Greek: Ὄρθος , \"Orthos\") was, according to the mythographer Apollodorus, a two-headed dog who guarded Geryon's cattle and was killed by Heracles. He was the offspring of the monsters Echidna and Typhon, and the brother of Cerberus, who was also a multi-headed guard dog.\n\nStatement:\nCerberus was older than Orthrus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Orthrus was the offspring of the monsters Echidna and Typhon, and the brother of Cerberus.\n[Inference] The document does not state the age of Cerberus or Orthrus, or which one was older.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to prime a keurig coffee maker<br>Remove the reservoir. You may be getting a \" prime \" error on your machine due to a dirty water reservoir. Take the lid off of the water reservoir, and remove the water reservoir from your machine.\n\nStatement:\nThe water reservoir needs to be taken out to be cleaned.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to prime a keurig coffee maker<br>Remove the reservoir. You may be getting a \" prime \" error on your machine due to a dirty water reservoir. Take the lid off of the water reservoir, and remove the water reservoir from your machine.\n\nStatement:\nThe water reservoir needs to be taken out to be cleaned.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Remove the reservoir.\n[Extraction] You may be getting a \" prime \" error on your machine due to a dirty water reservoir.\n[Inference] This implies that the water reservoir is being removed to fix the \"prime\" error, which is due to it being dirty, and thus needs to be cleaned.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nA Long Hike<br>Martha was in the middle of an extremely long hike. She was super tired and getting ready to give up. At this point she was so far in that turning back was useless. She forced herself to trudge through her laziness. When she did finish the hike, she felt thrilled and proud of herself.\n\nStatement:\nmartha was going on the longest hike ever. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nA Long Hike<br>Martha was in the middle of an extremely long hike. She was super tired and getting ready to give up. At this point she was so far in that turning back was useless. She forced herself to trudge through her laziness. When she did finish the hike, she felt thrilled and proud of herself.\n\nStatement:\nmartha was going on the longest hike ever. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Martha was in the middle of an extremely long hike.\n[Inference] However, the document does not state that it was the longest hike ever.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nNew York, NY – For the third straight year, Latino Sports photographer Jeremías Pérez Artiga covered this weekend’s Professional Bull Riders annual New York event, Monster Energy Buck Off at the Garden. An avid bull riding fan, Jeremías had the opportunity to be close to the action as well as observe what happens behind the scenes. With that said enjoy the photos from Madison Square Garden!\n\nStatement:\nThis passage was based off of Manhattan",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nNew York, NY – For the third straight year, Latino Sports photographer Jeremías Pérez Artiga covered this weekend’s Professional Bull Riders annual New York event, Monster Energy Buck Off at the Garden. An avid bull riding fan, Jeremías had the opportunity to be close to the action as well as observe what happens behind the scenes. With that said enjoy the photos from Madison Square Garden!\n\nStatement:\nThis passage was based off of Manhattan",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the passage mentions New York, NY.\n[Inference] Manhattan is a part of New York, NY.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn-form Rooney's hot goalscoring streak of seven goals in his last four internationals saw him win the vote to be crowned England's Player of the Year for 2008. Manchester United striker Rooney, 23, is set for his 50th cap against Ukraine at Wembley tomorrow and is enjoying the best form of his England career after a heart-to-heart with Capello. England boss Capello ordered Rooney to work hard on his finishing, stop shooting from long range and start scoring tap-ins to help transform him into a prolific marksman.\n\nStatement:\nRooney is set for his 50th cap against Ukraine.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nIn-form Rooney's hot goalscoring streak of seven goals in his last four internationals saw him win the vote to be crowned England's Player of the Year for 2008. Manchester United striker Rooney, 23, is set for his 50th cap against Ukraine at Wembley tomorrow and is enjoying the best form of his England career after a heart-to-heart with Capello. England boss Capello ordered Rooney to work hard on his finishing, stop shooting from long range and start scoring tap-ins to help transform him into a prolific marksman.\n\nStatement:\nRooney is set for his 50th cap against Ukraine.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Manchester United striker Rooney, 23, is set for his 50th cap against Ukraine at Wembley tomorrow.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nVillage of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926) , more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, and served to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns nationwide in the United States and in other countries of the world including Canada.\n\nStatement:\nEuclid v. Amble was decided in the 20s",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nVillage of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926) , more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, and served to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns nationwide in the United States and in other countries of the world including Canada.\n\nStatement:\nEuclid v. Amble was decided in the 20s",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926), more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926.\n[Inference] The case being argued in 1926 implies that it was decided in the 1920s.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLast month, native bird trappers have snared and caught the Luzon Buttonquail (Turnix worcesteri or Worcester's buttonquail) in Dalton Pass, a cold and wind-swept bird passageway in the Caraballo Mountains, in Nueva Vizcaya, located between Cordillera Central and Sierra Madre mountain ranges, in Northern Luzon. The rare species, previously known to birders only through drawings based on dead museum specimens collected several decades ago, was identified in a documentary filmed in the Philippines called Bye-Bye Birdie.\"\n\nStatement:\nLuzon Buttonquail has red tongue. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Not Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nLast month, native bird trappers have snared and caught the Luzon Buttonquail (Turnix worcesteri or Worcester's buttonquail) in Dalton Pass, a cold and wind-swept bird passageway in the Caraballo Mountains, in Nueva Vizcaya, located between Cordillera Central and Sierra Madre mountain ranges, in Northern Luzon. The rare species, previously known to birders only through drawings based on dead museum specimens collected several decades ago, was identified in a documentary filmed in the Philippines called Bye-Bye Birdie.\"\n\nStatement:\nLuzon Buttonquail has red tongue. ",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, there is no information about the Luzon Buttonquail having a red tongue.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Not Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to prevent feline upper respiratory illness<br>Get your cat vaccinated. Vaccination against cat flu is considered an essential vaccine. The flu vaccine needs to be given regularly and it comes in a variety of types (modified live, modified live intranasal, killed vaccine) which determines how often the vaccine needs to be given.\n\nStatement:\nThe flu vaccine for cats only comes in one type",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Contradictory",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nHow to prevent feline upper respiratory illness<br>Get your cat vaccinated. Vaccination against cat flu is considered an essential vaccine. The flu vaccine needs to be given regularly and it comes in a variety of types (modified live, modified live intranasal, killed vaccine) which determines how often the vaccine needs to be given.\n\nStatement:\nThe flu vaccine for cats only comes in one type",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, the flu vaccine comes in a variety of types (modified live, modified live intranasal, killed vaccine).\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Contradictory].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"Not Attributable\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"Contradictory\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"Attributable\".\n4. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAt least 58 people are now dead as a result of the recent flooding in Yemen, and at least 20,000 in the country have no access to shelter. Five people are also reported missing. The Yemeni government has pledged to send tents to help the homeless. The flooding is caused by the recent heavy rain in Yemen, which came as a shock due to the fact that the country only receives several centimeters of rain per year.\n\nStatement:\nShelter was lost for over 20,000 people",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Attributable",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Determine whether the provided statement is attributable to the document.\n1. If any information in the statement is missing in the document, you should say \"[Not Attributable]\".\n2. If any information in the statement is contradictory to the document, you should say \"[Contradictory]\".\n3. If all information in the statement is supported by the document, you should say \"[Attributable]\".\n4. Before showing your answer, think step-by-step and show your specific reasoning. When you extract information from the document, you should use [Extraction] to indicate that. When you infer information using the document, you should use [Inference] to indicate that. When you conclude your reasoning, you should use [Conclusion] to indicate that.\n5. You must use the information only in the document to make your decision.\n\nDocument:\nAt least 58 people are now dead as a result of the recent flooding in Yemen, and at least 20,000 in the country have no access to shelter. Five people are also reported missing. The Yemeni government has pledged to send tents to help the homeless. The flooding is caused by the recent heavy rain in Yemen, which came as a shock due to the fact that the country only receives several centimeters of rain per year.\n\nStatement:\nShelter was lost for over 20,000 people",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "[Extraction] According to the document, at least 20,000 in the country have no access to shelter.\n[Inference] This implies that shelter was lost for these people, as they previously had access to it but now do not.\n[Conclusion] So, the statement is [Attributable].",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 8