Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
study
stringclasses
8 values
case
stringclasses
19 values
policy
stringclasses
21 values
model
stringclasses
20 values
seed
int64
1k
1.06M
metric
stringclasses
188 values
value
float64
0
1.54k
record_status
stringclasses
2 values
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.466146
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.brier
0.482969
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.log_loss
1.623194
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.ece
0.483854
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
1
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.533854
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.533854
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.451389
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.466146
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.502604
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.brier
0.25
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.693147
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.ece
0.002604
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.555556
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.479167
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.891927
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.brier
0.0912
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.318224
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.ece
0.024408
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.632813
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.041667
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.065844
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.756944
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.826823
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.895833
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.brier
0.087966
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.311016
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.ece
0.008531
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.690104
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.045573
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.066038
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.75
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_11
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.847656
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.901042
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.brier
0.083575
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.301396
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.ece
0.014057
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.69401
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.046875
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.067542
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.736111
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_11
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.847656
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.891927
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.brier
0.090251
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.318128
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.ece
0.016857
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.645833
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.042969
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.066532
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.722222
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_29
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.851563
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.902344
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.brier
0.083494
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.301076
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.ece
0.008915
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.695313
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.044271
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.06367
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.743056
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_29
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.852865
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.894531
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.brier
0.088692
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.314211
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.ece
0.013685
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.671875
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.044271
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.065891
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.743056
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
autoregressive
autoregressive_47
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.851563
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.accuracy
0.903646
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.brier
0.08277
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.log_loss
0.298704
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.ece
0.012651
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0.720052
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.048177
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.066908
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.early_accuracy
0.729167
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recurrent
recurrent_47
1,001
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.851563
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.accuracy
0.549479
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.brier
0.407969
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.log_loss
1.377824
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.ece
0.400521
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
1
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0.450521
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.high_confidence_error_rate
0.450521
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.early_accuracy
0.533333
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_expert
fixed_expert
2,002
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.549479
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.accuracy
0.52474
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.brier
0.25
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.log_loss
0.693147
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.ece
0.02474
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.high_confidence_coverage
0
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.confidently_wrong_rate
0
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.early_accuracy
0.525
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
fixed_uniform
fixed_uniform
2,002
metrics.sampled_accuracy
0.494792
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
2,002
metrics.accuracy
0.869792
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
2,002
metrics.brier
0.106455
historical metric issue
benchmark-v1
standard
recency
recency
2,002
metrics.log_loss
0.364607
historical metric issue
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Causal Memory & Routing Lab: synthetic evaluation archive

Code and protocols · Interactive explorer

Historical v0.1.0: 208,210 scalar metric rows from eight completed result records, plus nine full trace archives including the failed recurring-memory-v1 export. The earlier benchmark-v1 metric issue is retained. Archive payload totals 728,066,833 bytes. QCA synthetic arrays/receipt are in qca-synthetic.json. No human-subject, private project, peptide or web data.

Two-speed follow-up

The additive two_speed_metrics configuration contains 130,205 scalar metric rows from six independent coefficient worlds, eight stream seeds per world, eight cases and eleven policies. The two configurations contain 338,415 rows in total. The new rows add a world field; model also identifies that world. Streams/cases within a world are dependent; the six world means, not individual predictions, are the independent interval units.

Scientific qualification: FAIL. Causal controls pass; adaptation, retention, quality and the adaptive-window minimum-value gate fail. A small observed balanced advantage does not satisfy the frozen minimum-gain interval margin. Read the interpretation and frozen protocol.

two-speed-index.json supplies the exact size and SHA-256 of artifacts/two-speed-v1.tar.gz. This tenth archive contains 384 numeric NPZ streams, fitted synthetic checkpoints, frozen sources, all validation candidates, SQLite feedback and verification receipts. Load NPZ files with allow_pickle=False. Rows include exposed evaluator answers; neither the archive nor its seeds are a new hidden test set. Previous archives and v0.1.0 tags are preserved. No pretrained/peptide weights or private project data.

Dataset structure

The metrics configuration has one evaluation split. Each row contains: study (run ID), case, policy, model (initialization identifier when applicable), seed (stream seed), metric (dot-separated numeric endpoint), value (float), and record_status. Metric units depend on the endpoint: loss is natural-log nats, accuracy/error/coverage are fractions, response is feedback steps, and count fields count examples/events. None values are omitted. Rows are not independent examples: many endpoints/models share the same stream.

research-index.json retains study summaries, gates and original receipt digests. artifacts-index.json specifies exact archive sizes, hashes and URLs. Each artifacts/RUN.tar.gz contains original synthetic JSONL trace paths and representative synthetic-feedback SQLite databases when available. Frozen toy .npz checkpoints, protocols, result JSON and sanitized historical proofs are in the GitHub repository. There are no pretrained models.

Generation and intended use

Data came from the registered local generators, seeds, calibration, training, validation and test flows documented in the code repository. The permitted use is audit, reproduction and study of bounded synthetic routing/memory behavior, including negative results. The research was developed with Codex assistance and has not been peer reviewed.

Leakage and limitations

Raw traces deliberately contain evaluation labels, private rule/context IDs, switches and other scoring metadata. Those are never policy inputs. Current predictions precede feedback; SQLite retrieval requires step < cutoff. Read the field boundary before reuse. This is an exposed evaluation archive, not a fresh held-out benchmark or recommended training corpus. Training/selection on it invalidates subsequent held-out claims on these streams. New confirmation needs fresh seeds/protocols.

Do not combine incompatible studies into an overall performance score. Known experts, hand-designed observations, unequal memory/compute budgets and conditional confidence intervals limit generalization. The initial AR, matched AR, sensor primary-value and forgetting qualification failures are visible; local recall/confidence successes do not establish semantic memory, novel task learning, quantum advantage, general architecture superiority or AGI.

License and citation

Code and generated synthetic data: Apache-2.0. Cite the repository release and the primary papers listed there. NVIDIA is an external reference, not an endorser. Publication excludes workstation inventory, credentials, chat logs, old projects, environment folders and unrelated security research.

Downloads last month
221