study stringclasses 8
values | case stringclasses 19
values | policy stringclasses 21
values | model stringclasses 20
values | seed int64 1k 1.06M | metric stringclasses 188
values | value float64 0 1.54k | record_status stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.466146 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.482969 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 1.623194 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.483854 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 1 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.533854 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.533854 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.451389 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.466146 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.502604 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.25 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.693147 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.002604 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.555556 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.479167 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.891927 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.0912 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.318224 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.024408 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.632813 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.041667 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.065844 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.756944 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.826823 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.895833 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.087966 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.311016 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.008531 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.690104 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.045573 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.066038 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.75 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_11 | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.847656 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.901042 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.083575 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.301396 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.014057 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.69401 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.046875 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.067542 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.736111 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_11 | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.847656 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.891927 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.090251 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.318128 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.016857 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.645833 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.042969 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.066532 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.722222 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_29 | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.851563 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.902344 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.083494 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.301076 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.008915 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.695313 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.044271 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.06367 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.743056 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_29 | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.852865 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.894531 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.088692 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.314211 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.013685 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.671875 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.044271 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.065891 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.743056 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | autoregressive | autoregressive_47 | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.851563 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.accuracy | 0.903646 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.brier | 0.08277 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.log_loss | 0.298704 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.ece | 0.012651 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0.720052 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.048177 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.066908 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.729167 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recurrent | recurrent_47 | 1,001 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.851563 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.accuracy | 0.549479 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.brier | 0.407969 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.log_loss | 1.377824 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.ece | 0.400521 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 1 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0.450521 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.high_confidence_error_rate | 0.450521 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.533333 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_expert | fixed_expert | 2,002 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.549479 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.accuracy | 0.52474 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.brier | 0.25 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.log_loss | 0.693147 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.ece | 0.02474 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.high_confidence_coverage | 0 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.confidently_wrong_rate | 0 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.early_accuracy | 0.525 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | fixed_uniform | fixed_uniform | 2,002 | metrics.sampled_accuracy | 0.494792 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 2,002 | metrics.accuracy | 0.869792 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 2,002 | metrics.brier | 0.106455 | historical metric issue |
benchmark-v1 | standard | recency | recency | 2,002 | metrics.log_loss | 0.364607 | historical metric issue |
Causal Memory & Routing Lab: synthetic evaluation archive
Code and protocols · Interactive explorer
Historical v0.1.0: 208,210 scalar metric rows from eight completed result records,
plus nine full trace archives including the failed recurring-memory-v1 export.
The earlier benchmark-v1 metric issue is retained. Archive payload totals
728,066,833 bytes. QCA synthetic arrays/receipt are in
qca-synthetic.json. No human-subject, private project, peptide or web data.
Two-speed follow-up
The additive two_speed_metrics configuration contains 130,205 scalar metric
rows from six independent coefficient worlds, eight stream seeds per world,
eight cases and eleven policies. The two configurations contain 338,415
rows in total. The new rows add a world field; model also identifies that
world. Streams/cases within a world are dependent; the six world means, not
individual predictions, are the independent interval units.
Scientific qualification: FAIL. Causal controls pass; adaptation, retention, quality and the adaptive-window minimum-value gate fail. A small observed balanced advantage does not satisfy the frozen minimum-gain interval margin. Read the interpretation and frozen protocol.
two-speed-index.json supplies the exact size and SHA-256 of
artifacts/two-speed-v1.tar.gz. This tenth archive contains 384 numeric NPZ
streams, fitted synthetic checkpoints, frozen sources, all validation
candidates, SQLite feedback and verification receipts. Load NPZ files with
allow_pickle=False. Rows include exposed evaluator answers; neither the
archive nor its seeds are a new hidden test set. Previous archives and v0.1.0
tags are preserved. No pretrained/peptide weights or private project data.
Dataset structure
The metrics configuration has one evaluation split. Each row contains:
study (run ID), case, policy, model (initialization identifier when
applicable), seed (stream seed), metric (dot-separated numeric endpoint),
value (float), and record_status. Metric units depend on the endpoint:
loss is natural-log nats, accuracy/error/coverage are fractions, response is
feedback steps, and count fields count examples/events. None values are omitted.
Rows are not independent examples: many endpoints/models share the same stream.
research-index.json retains study summaries, gates and original receipt
digests. artifacts-index.json specifies exact archive sizes, hashes and URLs.
Each artifacts/RUN.tar.gz contains original synthetic JSONL trace paths and
representative synthetic-feedback SQLite databases when available. Frozen
toy .npz checkpoints, protocols, result JSON and sanitized historical proofs
are in the GitHub repository. There are no pretrained models.
Generation and intended use
Data came from the registered local generators, seeds, calibration, training, validation and test flows documented in the code repository. The permitted use is audit, reproduction and study of bounded synthetic routing/memory behavior, including negative results. The research was developed with Codex assistance and has not been peer reviewed.
Leakage and limitations
Raw traces deliberately contain evaluation labels, private rule/context IDs,
switches and other scoring metadata. Those are never policy inputs. Current
predictions precede feedback; SQLite retrieval requires step < cutoff.
Read the field boundary before reuse.
This is an exposed evaluation archive, not a fresh held-out benchmark or
recommended training corpus. Training/selection on it invalidates subsequent
held-out claims on these streams. New confirmation needs fresh seeds/protocols.
Do not combine incompatible studies into an overall performance score. Known experts, hand-designed observations, unequal memory/compute budgets and conditional confidence intervals limit generalization. The initial AR, matched AR, sensor primary-value and forgetting qualification failures are visible; local recall/confidence successes do not establish semantic memory, novel task learning, quantum advantage, general architecture superiority or AGI.
License and citation
Code and generated synthetic data: Apache-2.0. Cite the repository release and the primary papers listed there. NVIDIA is an external reference, not an endorser. Publication excludes workstation inventory, credentials, chat logs, old projects, environment folders and unrelated security research.
- Downloads last month
- 221